FTMO vs FundedNext—Which prop firm is the right choice for you in 2025? If you’re having trouble making a decision, you’re not the only one. Both firms provide funding, but their payout structures, challenges, and rules vary in ways that could significantly impact your trading journey. Making a choice without proper knowledge could lead to wasted time and resources. This comprehensive comparison lays out all the details so you can select the best firm and begin trading with assurance.
FTMO vs FundedNext – Overview
 |
 |
|
|---|---|---|
Founded |
2014 |
2022 |
Maximum Profit Split |
Up to 90% (95% with Scaling) |
Up to 95% |
Payout Speed |
Monthly |
Within 24 hours |
Challenge Time Limit |
Yes (30/60 days) |
No time limit |
Profit Share in Challenge |
No |
Yes (15%) |
Scaling Plan |
Yes (25% every 4 months) |
Limited scaling |
Trading Platforms |
MT4, MT5, cTrader |
MT4, MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader |
News Trading |
Allowed (with restrictions) |
Allowed (except Express model) |
Drawdown Limits |
5% daily / 10% overall |
5% daily / 10% overall (flexible enforcement) |
Customer Support |
24/5 |
24/7 (50-second response time) |
Website |
FTMO vs FundedNext: Company Background
Reputation and experience are important when choosing a prop trading firm. FTMO, founded in 2014 and based in the Czech Republic, is one of the most respected names in the industry. It has earned a strong reputation for its structured evaluation process, trader-friendly conditions, and thriving community of successful traders. Many professionals consider FTMO the benchmark for prop trading success. Want to know more? Check out our full FTMO review.
FundedNext, launched in 2022 and headquartered in the UAE, is a rising star in the prop trading world. Despite being newer, it has gained traction by offering faster payouts, profit-sharing during the challenge phase, and no time limits on evaluations. Its flexible, trader-first approach makes it an appealing alternative to FTMO’s structured model. Curious about what sets FundedNext apart? Read our full FundedNext review.
While both firms aim to provide traders with capital to scale their strategies, they differ in how they structure their funding programs and account sizes.
Funding Programs & Account Sizes
FTMO and FundedNext both offer multiple funding options, but they take different approaches to getting traders funded.
FTMO follows a two-step evaluation process, where traders must first pass a Phase 1 challenge (hitting an 8% profit target) and then a Phase 2 verification (requiring a 5% profit target). Only after clearing both phases do traders receive a funded account, with account sizes ranging from $10,000 to $200,000. While this process ensures disciplined traders, it also means that getting funded takes time.
FundedNext, however, offers both two-step and one-step challenges. The one-step “Express” program allows traders to get funded faster, with no second verification phase. Additionally, FundedNext provides profit-sharing during the challenge phase, something FTMO does not. Account sizes range from $6,000 to $200,000, and traders can start with lower capital at a cheaper entry fee than FTMO.
For traders looking for a more structured and traditional challenge, FTMO is a strong option. But for those who want faster funding, more flexibility, and immediate profit sharing, FundedNext presents a compelling alternative.
FundedNext vs FTMO: Profit Split & Rewards
Getting a funded account is just the beginning—the real question is, how much of your profits do you actually keep?
FTMO offers traders an 80% base profit split, with the potential to scale up to 90% through their scaling plan. While this is a competitive rate, traders must first prove consistency and longevity before unlocking the highest payout percentage. FTMO also refunds the challenge fee after the first successful withdrawal, making it a trader-friendly bonus.
FundedNext, however, goes a step further. It provides a base 80% profit split just like FTMO, but traders can increase it to 95% with an add-on feature. What truly sets FundedNext apart is its profit-sharing during the challenge phase, where traders receive 15% of their profits even before getting funded. No other major prop firm, including FTMO, offers this. Additionally, FundedNext guarantees payouts within 24 hours, compared to FTMO’s standard monthly payout cycle.
In short, FTMO is a strong option for traders looking for a proven structure with long-term scaling potential, while FundedNext appeals to those who want higher profit splits, faster withdrawals, and rewards even before getting fully funded.
FundedNext vs FTMO: Trading Challenges & Evaluation Process
The journey to securing a funded account varies significantly between FTMO and FundedNext.
FTMO has a strict two-phase challenge process designed to filter out inconsistent traders. In Phase 1, traders must hit an 8% profit target within 30 days, while in Phase 2, they need to achieve 5% within 60 days—both without exceeding a 5% daily drawdown or 10% overall loss. There is no flexibility on time limits, making it a test of both skill and time management.
FundedNext, in contrast, offers both a two-step and a one-step challenge. The two-step challenge has similar profit targets to FTMO but removes the time limit, allowing traders to trade at their own pace. The one-step “Express” challenge is even more flexible—traders need to hit their target just once to get funded, skipping the second verification phase entirely. This makes it one of the fastest funding options in the industry.
If you prefer a structured, time-sensitive challenge, FTMO is the way to go. But if you want more flexibility, no time pressure, or the fastest route to a funded account, FundedNext is a better fit.
Drawdown & Risk Management Rules
Risk management can make or break a trader, and both FTMO and FundedNext enforce strict rules to protect capital.
FTMO sets clear risk limits. Traders cannot lose more than 5% in a single day or exceed a 10% overall drawdown at any point. These limits apply across both the challenge and funded stages. FTMO also penalizes traders for violating consistency rules, such as excessive lot sizing, to ensure disciplined risk-taking.
FundedNext follows a similar 5% daily drawdown and 10% overall loss limit, but it offers more flexibility. Unlike FTMO, which applies a hard stop, FundedNext allows traders to trade past the daily drawdown until they close their trades. This small but important difference can prevent premature disqualifications. Additionally, FundedNext provides a 10% maximum loss limit in all its funding models, including its one-step challenge, making it more forgiving than FTMO’s standard structure.
Traders who thrive under strict discipline and consistency checks may prefer FTMO. Those looking for a bit more breathing room in managing risk will find FundedNext’s approach more accommodating.
FTMO vs FundedNext: Trading Platforms & Tools
A reliable trading platform is essential for execution speed, strategy implementation, and overall performance.
FTMO supports MetaTrader 4 (MT4), MetaTrader 5 (MT5), and cTrader, ensuring compatibility with the most widely used trading software. It also provides an exclusive performance dashboard, where traders can review analytics, track progress, and identify strengths and weaknesses. FTMO even offers a Trading Psychology & Performance Coach to help traders refine their mindset.
FundedNext expands platform choices by offering MT4, MT5, Match-Trader, and cTrader, catering to a wider range of traders. It also integrates advanced in-house technology to enhance execution speed and reliability. While it lacks a dedicated psychology coach, it compensates with AI-powered analytics and faster execution tools to give traders an edge.
FTMO is the better choice for traders who value psychological coaching and in-depth performance tracking, while FundedNext is ideal for those who prioritize platform flexibility and cutting-edge execution technology.
Allowed Trading Strategies
Every trader has a unique style, but not all prop firms welcome every strategy. FTMO and FundedNext take different approaches when it comes to trading flexibility.
FTMO allows scalping, swing trading, and algorithmic trading (EAs) but restricts certain high-risk tactics. News trading is permitted, but traders must follow strict risk guidelines. FTMO does not allow martingale strategies, latency arbitrage, or copy trading from external sources.
FundedNext offers more freedom. It allows scalping, swing trading, algorithmic trading, and even news trading without restrictions. Traders can hold positions through high-impact news events, something FTMO does not always allow. However, FundedNext’s Express model restricts news trading, so traders should choose their plan carefully.
Traders who rely on technical strategies and structured trading will feel comfortable with FTMO. Those who prefer unrestricted news trading and high-frequency trading (HFT) will benefit from FundedNext’s flexibility.
FTMO vs FundedNext: Payout & Withdrawal
How and when a trader gets paid matters just as much as the profit split. FTMO and FundedNext handle withdrawals differently.
FTMO processes monthly payouts, meaning traders must wait a full calendar month to withdraw profits. After the first withdrawal, FTMO refunds the challenge fee. The firm supports payments via bank transfers, crypto, and online payment gateways, ensuring flexibility.
FundedNext offers faster payouts, processing withdrawals within 24 hours—a major advantage over FTMO’s monthly cycle. Traders also receive 15% of their profits during the challenge phase, something FTMO does not offer. Payout methods include bank transfers, crypto, and multiple e-wallets, similar to FTMO.
Traders who don’t mind a structured monthly payout schedule will find FTMO reliable. Those who want faster withdrawals and earlier profit-sharing will see FundedNext as the better choice.
FundedNext vs FTMO: Customer Support
A strong support system and trader community can make a big difference, especially in prop trading.
FTMO provides 24/5 customer support, meaning traders can reach out on weekdays but not on weekends. Response times remain fast, and traders can contact support through live chat, email, and phone. FTMO also fosters an active community with regular trader interviews, educational webinars, and global trader meetups. However, its trader engagement focuses more on experienced traders rather than beginners.
FundedNext takes customer support a step further with 24/7 availability. Traders can get assistance anytime, even on weekends, with an average response time of just 50 seconds. The firm also boasts a massive 1.2 million+ member trading community across various platforms, offering traders a space to share insights, discuss strategies, and get real-time updates.
Traders who value structured support and organized educational content will appreciate FTMO’s approach. Those who need round-the-clock support and a highly active community will find FundedNext more appealing.
Additional Features
Beyond the core features, FTMO and FundedNext offer extra perks that set them apart.
FTMO provides a scaling plan that lets traders increase their account size by 25% every four months if they meet performance targets. It also offers a free trial challenge, allowing traders to practice before committing to the real evaluation. Additionally, FTMO’s trading journal, account analysis tools, and psychology coaching help traders refine their strategies and mental discipline.
FundedNext stands out with its profit-sharing during the challenge phase, 24-hour payout processing, and no time limit on challenges—all major advantages over FTMO. It also allows faster funding through its one-step challenge, making it ideal for traders who want to scale quickly.
FTMO is the better choice for traders who prefer long-term scaling opportunities and structured growth tools. FundedNext offers faster payouts, flexible funding options, and a trader-friendly challenge model, making it the go-to for those who want quicker results.
FundedNext vs FTMO: Reviews
A prop firm’s reputation speaks volumes about its reliability and trader experience.
FTMO has been in the industry since 2014 and has built a solid reputation as one of the most trusted and respected prop firms. Traders consistently praise its transparency, structured evaluation process, and timely payouts. With thousands of positive reviews on Trustpilot and other platforms, FTMO remains the industry benchmark for legitimacy. However, some traders find the time limits in the challenge phase restrictive and believe the payout cycle could be faster.
FundedNext, despite launching in 2022, has quickly gained traction. It holds a strong 4.6 Trustpilot rating, with traders appreciating its profit-sharing during the challenge phase, fast 24-hour payouts, and flexible trading conditions. However, some traders mention occasional inconsistencies in execution speed and communication, likely due to its rapid expansion.
FTMO vs FundedNext: Pros & Cons
Both FTMO and FundedNext offer excellent opportunities, but each has strengths and weaknesses.
FTMO Pros:
✅ Established and trusted since 2014
✅ Structured scaling plan for long-term growth
✅ Free trial challenge for practice
✅ Strong community, trader education, and performance coaching
✅ Offers MT4, MT5, and cTrader
FTMO Cons:
❌ Monthly payouts (no instant withdrawals)
❌ Strict time limits in the challenge phase
❌ No profit-sharing during the challenge
FundedNext Pros:
✅ Profit-sharing before getting funded (15%)
✅ 24-hour guaranteed payouts (faster withdrawals)
✅ No time limit on challenges (trade at your own pace)
✅ One-step funding option (faster access to capital)
✅ Supports MT4, MT5, cTrader, and Match-Trader
FundedNext Cons:
❌ Newer company with a shorter track record
❌ Some models restrict news trading
❌ Scaling plan isn’t as structured as FTMO’s
FTMO is perfect for traders who want a proven firm with structured scaling and strong educational resources. FundedNext is better for those who prioritize flexibility, faster payouts, and more lenient challenge rules.
FTMO vs FundedNext: Which One Should You Choose?
The right choice depends on your trading style, goals, and priorities.
Choose FTMO if you value a well-established firm with a proven track record, structured scaling opportunities, and strong trader education. FTMO is best for traders who can handle time constraints in the challenge phase and prefer a long-term growth model. Its trading psychology coaching and detailed performance analysis tools also make it ideal for those who want to improve their discipline and consistency.
Go with FundedNext if you want faster payouts, more flexibility, and profit-sharing during the challenge phase. The no time limit on challenges and one-step funding option make it a great choice for traders who prefer a less restrictive evaluation process. If quick withdrawals and minimal waiting times are important, FundedNext stands out as the better option.
For traders seeking stability and long-term career growth, FTMO remains the gold standard. For those who prioritize flexibility, quicker funding, and trader-friendly conditions, FundedNext is the clear winner.
Conclusion
Both FTMO and FundedNext offer top-tier funding opportunities, but they cater to different trader needs.
The right firm for you should provide a balance of funding accessibility, trading flexibility, and reliable payouts. Whether you value structured growth, instant rewards, or unrestricted trading conditions, your decision should empower you to trade with confidence. Focus on what matters most to your trading style, and choose a firm that helps you maximize your edge in the markets.
Compare also ↓
FAQs
1. Is FTMO better than FundedNext?
FTMO offers a proven track record, structured scaling, and strong educational resources, while FundedNext provides faster payouts, no time limits on challenges, and profit-sharing during evaluation. The better choice depends on your trading goals and preferred funding structure.
2. Which firm pays traders faster, FTMO or FundedNext?
FundedNext pays within 24 hours, while FTMO follows a monthly payout schedule. If quick withdrawals matter, FundedNext is the better option.
3. Does FundedNext have a time limit for completing the challenge?
No, FundedNext allows traders to complete the challenge at their own pace, unlike FTMO, which enforces a 30-day Phase 1 and 60-day Phase 2 limit.
4. Can I trade news events with FTMO and FundedNext?
Yes, but with restrictions. FTMO allows news trading under strict conditions, while FundedNext permits it on most accounts except for the Express model.
5. Which firm offers the best profit split?
Both firms provide up to 95% profit splits, but FundedNext offers 15% profit-sharing during the challenge phase, giving traders a head start before getting funded.
6. What happens if I violate the drawdown limits?
Both firms will revoke the account if you exceed the 5% daily loss or 10% total drawdown. FundedNext allows trades to remain open past the daily limit, while FTMO enforces an immediate stop.