IC Markets vs Pepperstone: The Real Winner for 2025 Traders

When comparing IC Markets vs Pepperstone, you’re looking at two of the biggest names in Australian forex trading giants. Both promise ultra-fast execution and tight spreads, but their strengths differ in key areas. Let’s see which broker truly delivers more value for traders in 2025.

IC Markets vs Pepperstone: A Side-by-Side Comparison

Founded	2007	2010
Regulation	ASIC, CySEC, FSA, CMA, SCB	FCA, ASIC, CySEC, BaFin, DFSA, CMA, SCB
Minimum Deposit	$200	$0
Platforms	MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView, ZuluTrade	MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView
Total Instruments	2,239	1,344
Forex Pairs	61	90
Cryptocurrencies	19	30
Stocks/CFDs	2,100	1,161
Commodities	26	40
Indices	24	23
EUR/USD Raw Spread	From 0.1 pips	From 0.0 pips
Commission (Raw)	$7/lot (MT4/MT5), $6/lot (cTrader)	$7/lot (MT4/MT5), $7/lot (cTrader)
Max Leverage	1:500 (FSA entity)	1:400 (CMA entity)
Customer Support	24/7	24/7
Trustpilot Score	4.8/5 (47,000+ reviews)	4.4/5 (3,100+ reviews)
Account Types	2 (Standard, Raw Spread)	2 (Standard, Razor)
Islamic Account	✅ Yes	✅ Yes
Demo Account	✅ Yes	✅ Yes
VPS Hosting	✅ Free (conditions apply)	❌ Not mentioned
Copy Trading	✅ ZuluTrade, Myfxbook	✅ Native, DupliTrade, Myfxbook

Regulation and Security

Both brokers maintain exceptional regulatory standards, though Pepperstone holds a slight edge with seven regulatory licenses versus IC Markets’ five. Pepperstone holds three Tier-1 licenses and two Tier-2 licenses, whereas IC Markets holds two Tier-1 licenses, making regulatory depth a distinguishing factor for risk-averse traders.

Reputation Breakdown

IC Markets:

• Trustpilot Score: 4.8 out of 5 stars
• Total Reviews: 47,000+ reviews

Pepperstone:

• Trustpilot Score: 4.4 out of 5 stars
• Total Reviews: 3,100+ reviews

🏆 Winner: IC Markets dominates reputation metrics with a near-perfect 4.8/5 score from 47,000+ reviews versus Pepperstone’s respectable 4.4/5 from 3,100+ reviews. The consistency of positive feedback across IC Markets’ massive review base demonstrates exceptional service delivery at scale, though Pepperstone’s ratings remain above industry average.

IC Markets:

• ASIC (Australian Securities and Investments Commission) – Primary license since 2007, license #335692
• CySEC (Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission) – License #362/18, ICF protection €20,000
• FSA Seychelles (Financial Services Authority) – IC Markets Global with 1:500 leverage
• CMA (Capital Markets Authority, Kenya) – East African market access
• SCB (Securities Commission of The Bahamas) – International entity

Pepperstone:

• FCA (Financial Conduct Authority, UK) – License #684312 with FSCS protection up to £85,000
• ASIC (Australian Securities and Investments Commission) – License #414530
• CySEC (Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission) – License #388/20, ICF coverage €20,000
• BaFin (Federal Financial Supervisory Authority, Germany) – European passporting
• DFSA (Dubai Financial Services Authority) – Middle East operations
• CMA (Capital Markets Authority, Kenya) – African markets
• SCB (Securities Commission of The Bahamas) – International clients

Client Fund Protection: IC Markets vs Pepperstone

A broker’s approach to client fund protection speaks volumes about its integrity and trustworthiness. Both IC Markets and Pepperstone enforce strong security measures, but their coverage levels differ slightly depending on location.

IC Markets 

IC Markets maintains a high standard of financial integrity by keeping all client funds fully segregated from the company’s assets.

Highlights:

• Segregated Accounts: All deposits are held with National Australia Bank and other tier-1 institutions, completely separated from operational capital.

• Compensation Schemes:

  • EU clients — Protected by the Investor Compensation Fund (ICF) up to €20,000.

• Negative Balance Protection: Ensures traders never lose more than their deposited capital, even in volatile markets.

• Financial Oversight: The broker publishes regular financial statements and maintains professional indemnity insurance.

• Regulatory Note: In July 2024, CySEC imposed a €200,000 fine for initial margin protection compliance issues—promptly rectified with no client fund impact.

IC Markets maintains solid protection measures, though the absence of UK FSCS coverage limits compensation options for British traders.

Pepperstone

Pepperstone takes client fund safety to a higher level, combining top-tier bank segregation with broad compensation coverage.

Highlights:

• Segregated Accounts: Client funds are held separately in Barclays, National Australia Bank, and other leading global institutions.

• Compensation Schemes:

  • UK clients — Covered by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) up to £85,000.

  • EU clients — Eligible for ICF protection up to €20,000.

• Negative Balance Protection: Applied across all retail accounts, ensuring traders cannot owe more than deposited.

• Financial Assurance: Holds professional indemnity insurance above regulatory minimums and conducts regular independent audits.

• Regulatory Record: Pepperstone boasts a clean compliance history with no major fines or violations.

Pepperstone’s mix of top-tier banking partners, FSCS coverage, and spotless regulatory record makes it one of the most secure brokers for fund protection.

Quick Comparison: Client Fund Protection

🏆 Winner: Pepperstone leads with superior fund protection through FCA regulation offering £85,000 FSCS compensation versus IC Markets’ €20,000 EU maximum. Pepperstone’s seven regulatory licenses (including FCA and BaFin) provide broader jurisdictional coverage and higher trust levels compared to IC Markets’ five licenses.

Trading Platforms and Tools

Platform offerings prove virtually identical between these brokers, with both supporting the industry’s most popular trading software. The subtle differences emerge in proprietary integrations and copy trading ecosystems rather than core platform availability.

IC Markets Trading Platforms:

• MetaTrader 4 – Classic platform with 50+ indicators, EA support, 40-50ms execution
• MetaTrader 5 – Advanced version with economic calendar, depth of market, additional order types
• cTrader – Professional ECN platform with Level II pricing, depth of market (DOM), cAlgo algorithmic trading
• TradingView – Basic chart integration for technical analysis
• ZuluTrade – Social copy trading for strategy replication
• Mobile Apps – iOS and Android supporting MT4, MT5, cTrader
• VPS Hosting – Free for accounts with $5,000+ balance or 30+ lots monthly

Pepperstone Trading Platforms:

• MetaTrader 4 – Industry standard with marketplace access, full automation support
• MetaTrader 5 – Enhanced MT platform with additional timeframes and technical tools
• cTrader – Professional ECN platform with Level II pricing, cAlgo for algo trading, advanced charting
• TradingView – Integrated charting with one-click execution
• Native Copy Trading – Built-in copy trading directly through Pepperstone platform
• DupliTrade – Automated strategy marketplace with 100+ signal providers
• Myfxbook AutoTrade – Social trading integration
• Mobile Apps – iOS and Android for MT4, MT5, cTrader

Trading Tools & Features

MetaTrader 4/5	✅ Full support	✅ Full support
cTrader	✅ ECN platform	✅ ECN platform
TradingView Integration	✅ Basic	✅ Integrated
Native Copy Trading	❌	✅ Built-in
Social Trading Platforms	✅ ZuluTrade, Myfxbook	✅ DupliTrade, Myfxbook
Average Execution Speed	40-50ms	38-45ms
Expert Advisors (EAs)	✅ Full support	✅ Full support
VPS Hosting	✅ Free (conditions)	Not mentioned
API Trading	✅ FIX API	✅ FIX API
Mobile Trading	✅ iOS, Android	✅ iOS, Android
Market Depth	✅ cTrader Level II	✅ cTrader Level II
AutoChartist	✅ Available	✅ Available
Economic Calendar	✅ Integrated	✅ Integrated

🏆 Winner: Pepperstone edges ahead with native copy trading integration and superior copy trading ecosystem (DupliTrade, Myfxbook, proprietary platform) versus IC Markets’ ZuluTrade-only approach. However, IC Markets wins for automated traders with free VPS hosting that Pepperstone doesn’t offer. Platform core functionality remains identical.

Account Types and Minimum Deposit

The $200 entry barrier difference proves significant, with Pepperstone’s zero minimum deposit policy eliminating capital constraints entirely. Both brokers maintain simplified two-tier account structures avoiding unnecessary complexity.

Account Tiers Compared

Additional IC Markets Account Notes:

• Eight base currency options: USD, EUR, GBP, AUD, NZD, CAD, CHF, JPY, SGD
• Volume-based rebate program reduces commission by $1.50-$2.50 per lot for high-volume traders
• Maximum position size of 200 lots per trade
• Professional accounts available for traders meeting regulatory criteria

Additional Pepperstone Account Notes:

• Multiple base currency options including USD, EUR, GBP, AUD, NZD, CAD, CHF, JPY, SGD, HKD, PLN
• True $0 minimum means traders can open accounts and deposit any amount
• Active Trader Program offers commission rebates and premium benefits for high-volume clients
• Swap-free Islamic accounts available across all account types

🏆 Winner: Pepperstone dominates accessibility with $0 minimum deposit versus IC Markets’ $200 requirement—a game-changer for beginners and those testing brokers with minimal capital. Both offer identical 200-lot maximum positions and similar account features beyond entry requirements.

Trading Costs

IC Markets standard accounts have tighter spreads compared to Pepperstone, with IC Markets’ minimum spread being lower at 0.6 pips for standard accounts. However, raw spread accounts tell a more nuanced story where Pepperstone starts from 0.0 pips on major pairs.

Spreads and Commissions

Cost Calculation Example (1 lot EUR/USD on Raw/Razor accounts):

• IC Markets Raw (MT4/MT5): 0.1 pip spread + $7 commission = ~0.8 pip total cost
• IC Markets Raw (cTrader): 0.1 pip spread + $6 commission = ~0.7 pip total cost
• Pepperstone Razor: 0.0 pip spread + $7 commission = ~0.7 pip total cost

Hidden Fees to Watch

IC Markets:

• Inactivity Fee: None charged
• Deposit Fees: No internal fees; third-party payment processors may charge
• Withdrawal Fees: None from IC Markets; intermediary bank fees may apply
• Currency Conversion: Market rates for non-base currency trades
• Overnight Financing: Standard swap rates (exempt for Islamic accounts)
• Minimum Withdrawal: None specified
• Account Closure: No fees

Pepperstone:

• Inactivity Fee: None charged
• Deposit Fees: No internal fees; payment provider charges may apply
• Withdrawal Fees: None from Pepperstone; potential bank/intermediary fees
• Currency Conversion: Applied at prevailing market rates
• Overnight Financing: Swap rates for positions held overnight (Islamic accounts exempt)
• Minimum Withdrawal: None specified
• Account Maintenance: No monthly or annual fees

🏆 Winner: IC Markets marginally wins on total trading costs with 0.8 pip EUR/USD cost on MetaTrader Raw accounts (0.7 pips on cTrader) versus Pepperstone’s 0.9 pip equivalent. The difference narrows significantly when comparing IC Markets cTrader ($6 commission) to Pepperstone Razor ($7 commission), where both deliver ~0.7 pip total cost.

Available Instruments

Instrument selection reveals divergent strategies: IC Markets dominates stock CFDs with nearly double Pepperstone’s offerings, while Pepperstone leads forex pairs and commodities. IC Markets offers 2,239 tradable instruments while Pepperstone provides 1,344, though distribution across asset classes matters more than total count.

Instrument Breakdown by Asset Class

Forex Pairs:

• IC Markets: 61 currency pairs (majors, minors, exotics)
• Pepperstone: 90 currency pairs including extensive emerging market coverage
• Winner: Pepperstone with 29 additional forex pairs

Indices:

• IC Markets: 24 global stock indices
• Pepperstone: 23 index CFDs
• Winner: Essentially tied

Commodities:

• IC Markets: 26 commodities (metals, energies, agriculture)
• Pepperstone: 40 commodities with expanded agricultural products
• Winner: Pepperstone with 14 more commodity markets

Cryptocurrencies:

• IC Markets: 19 cryptocurrency CFDs
• Pepperstone: 30 crypto CFDs
• Winner: Pepperstone with 11 additional crypto assets

Stocks/Share CFDs:

• IC Markets: 2,100 stock CFDs across US, European, Australian exchanges
• Pepperstone: 1,161 individual stock CFDs
• Winner: IC Markets with 939 more stock CFDs

Bonds:

• IC Markets: ✅ Government bond futures available
• Pepperstone: ✅ Bond CFDs available

🏆 Winner: Tie with nuance—IC Markets dominates total instruments (2,239 vs 1,344) driven by massive stock CFD selection ideal for equity traders. Pepperstone wins for forex specialists (90 vs 61 pairs), commodity traders (40 vs 26), and crypto enthusiasts (30 vs 19). Choose based on your primary trading focus.

Leverage and Margin

Leverage availability depends on regulatory jurisdiction rather than broker preference, with both offering competitive ratios across entities. Pepperstone’s FCA regulation caps leverage lower than IC Markets’ FSA Seychelles entity, though practical differences remain minimal for most traders.

Leverage Comparison by Region and Account Type

Key Leverage Notes:

• Retail Caps: Tier-1 regulators (ASIC, FCA, CySEC, BaFin, DFSA) limit retail leverage to 1:30 forex, 1:20 indices, 1:10 commodities, 1:5 stocks, 1:2 crypto
• Professional Accounts: Traders meeting criteria (€500,000 portfolio, 40+ trades quarterly, financial sector employment) access higher leverage under European entities
• Negative Balance Protection: Both brokers provide this across all retail accounts
• Margin Call Level: Typically 100% for both brokers
• Stop Out Level: Usually 50% (positions automatically closed to prevent negative balances)

Dynamic Leverage Implementation: Both brokers employ tiered leverage where maximum ratios decrease as open position sizes grow:

• Up to $100,000 notional: Maximum leverage (1:500 IC Markets FSA, 1:400 Pepperstone CMA)
• $100,001-$500,000: Reduced to 1:200
• $500,001-$1,000,000: Further reduced to 1:100
• $1,000,001+: Minimum leverage 1:50

🏆 Winner: IC Markets offers marginally higher maximum leverage at 1:500 through FSA Seychelles entity versus Pepperstone’s 1:400 maximum through CMA Kenya. However, most traders under tier-1 regulation (ASIC, FCA, CySEC) face identical 1:30 caps, making this difference relevant only for international clients accessing offshore entities.

Deposits and Withdrawals

Payment flexibility and processing speed directly impact trading convenience, with both brokers offering extensive options. Pepperstone provides slight advantages in modern payment methods including Apple Pay, Google Pay, and cryptocurrency deposits unavailable through IC Markets.

Payment Methods

Processing Times

IC Markets:

• Deposit Processing:
  • Instant for cards, e-wallets, PayPal
  • 1-3 business days for wire transfers
• Withdrawal Processing:
  • E-wallets: Same day to 1 business day
  • PayPal: 1 business day
  • Credit/Debit cards: 3-7 business days
  • Bank wire: 2-5 business days
• Withdrawal Fees: None from IC Markets; third-party fees may apply
• Verification: KYC required before first withdrawal

Pepperstone:

• Deposit Processing:
  • Instant for cards, e-wallets, Apple Pay, Google Pay, PayPal, cryptocurrency
  • 1-3 business days for wire transfers
• Withdrawal Processing:
  • E-wallets: Same day to 1 business day
  • Apple/Google Pay: 1-3 business days
  • PayPal: 1 business day
  • Cards: 3-7 business days
  • Bank wire: 2-5 business days
  • Cryptocurrency: 1-2 business days
• Withdrawal Fees: None from Pepperstone; potential third-party charges
• Verification: Identity verification mandatory before withdrawals

🏆 Winner: Pepperstone leads payment flexibility with Apple Pay, Google Pay, and comprehensive cryptocurrency options unavailable through IC Markets. Both process e-wallet withdrawals within 1 business day, but Pepperstone’s modern payment integration (mobile wallets, crypto) appeals to younger traders and those seeking maximum funding convenience.

Customer Support

Both brokers operate 24/7 customer support, eliminating the weekend availability gap that plagues many competitors. Support quality proves exceptional for both, though user satisfaction ratings reveal slight differences in perceived responsiveness.

Support Availability Comparison

🏆 Winner: IC Markets edges ahead with superior Trustpilot ratings (4.9 vs 4.4) from a significantly larger review sample (47,000+ vs 3,100), suggesting more consistent support quality at scale. Both provide excellent 24/7 service, but IC Markets’ faster average chat response time (90 seconds vs 2 minutes) and higher user satisfaction give it the advantage.

Education and Research

Educational depth reveals divergent priorities: IC Markets invests heavily in comprehensive learning pathways, while Pepperstone focuses on advanced trading tools and market analysis. Both provide solid foundations, though IC Markets delivers more structured beginner content.

What IC Markets Offers:

• Education Hub: Structured learning progression from forex basics to advanced strategies
• Video Library: 100+ tutorial videos covering platforms, strategies, risk management
• Webinars: Regular educational sessions on trading fundamentals and market dynamics
• Economic Calendar: Real-time calendar with consensus forecasts, historical data, volatility impact indicators
• Trading Calculators: Pip value, margin, profit/loss, currency conversion, Fibonacci tools
• Market Analysis: Weekly market outlook with technical and fundamental insights
• AutoChartist: Pattern recognition identifying potential trading opportunities
• Demo Accounts: Unlimited virtual trading across MT4, MT5, cTrader
• Blog/News: Market updates, trading tips, broker announcements
• Trading Guides: Comprehensive PDF guides on forex, CFDs, platform usage

What Pepperstone Offers:

• Education Center: Tiered content from beginner basics to professional strategies
• Video Tutorials: Platform-specific guides for MT4, MT5, cTrader, plus strategy videos
• Webinars: Live trading sessions and educational presentations
• Economic Calendar: Integrated calendar with real-time updates and customizable filters
• Trading Calculators: Pip, margin, profit calculators plus currency converters
• Market Analysis: Daily market commentary from in-house and third-party analysts
• AutoChartist: Advanced pattern recognition and opportunity identification
• TradingView Integration: Access to TradingView’s massive education library and community
• Demo Accounts: Unlimited practice accounts mirroring live conditions
• Blog: Regular articles on trading strategies, psychology, market events
• Active Trader Program: Premium research and analysis for high-volume clients

Research Quality Comparison

🏆 Winner: IC Markets delivers superior structured education ideal for beginners with comprehensive learning paths, 100+ tutorial videos, and more beginner-focused content. Pepperstone wins for experienced traders seeking daily market analysis, advanced copy trading education, and integrated TradingView community resources. Choose based on experience level.

Trustpilot Reviews: What Real Users Say

Online reputation reveals significant differences in user satisfaction levels and market penetration. IC Markets’ massive review volume demonstrates exceptional market reach and customer base size, while both brokers maintain “Excellent” Trustpilot ratings indicating strong overall service quality.

IC Markets Trustpilot Reviews:

• Trustpilot Score: 4.8 out of 5 stars (Excellent rating)
• Total Reviews: 47,000+ reviews

Notable User Quotes:

• “One of the best brokers in the retail industry with nice customer service! Good executions, rarely spread spikes or slippage, overall great trading experience with ICM!”
• “IC Markets is in my opinion the best broker you can find on the market at the moment. Their support is always online and really superfast and helpful. Spreads and order execution work flawlessly.”
• “They respond quickly and accurately to your queries and I have never had any problems with them. Setup was less than 10 minutes and they understood my query right away as it relates to cTrader hedging versus netting.”

Pepperstone Trustpilot Reviews:

• Trustpilot Score: 4.4 out of 5 stars (Excellent rating)
• Total Reviews: 3,100+ reviews

Notable User Quotes:

• “Great experience with Pepperstone. The $0 minimum made it easy to test their platform risk-free before committing larger capital. Withdrawals always processed within 24 hours.”
• “Professional service with FCA regulation giving me confidence in fund safety. Their copy trading features helped me learn from experienced traders while building my own skills.”
• “Support team is knowledgeable and patient. They walked me through cTrader setup step-by-step when I switched from MT4. Execution quality excellent on major pairs.”

🏆 Winner: IC Markets dominates reputation metrics with an outstanding 4.8/5 score from 47,000+ reviews versus Pepperstone’s strong 4.4/5 from 3,100+ reviews. The consistency of positive feedback across IC Markets’ massive review base demonstrates exceptional service delivery at scale.

IC Markets or Pepperstone: Which Should You Choose

Both brokers deliver institutional-grade trading conditions with competitive pricing, robust regulation, and reliable execution that place them among the world’s elite ECN brokers. Your ideal choice depends on specific priorities rather than fundamental quality differences, as both satisfy professional trading requirements.

Choose IC Markets If:

• You prioritize lowest trading costs with 0.7-0.8 pip total EUR/USD expense versus Pepperstone’s 0.9 pips
• Stock CFD trading matters to your strategy (2,100+ stocks vs Pepperstone’s 1,161)
• Free VPS hosting benefits your automated trading systems ($5,000+ balance or 30+ lots monthly)
• Exceptional reputation backed by 20,000+ Trustpilot reviews at 4.9/5 rating influences decisions
• You value comprehensive education with structured learning paths ideal for beginners
• cTrader commission savings matter ($6/lot on cTrader vs Pepperstone’s $7/lot on all platforms)
• Total instrument count is priority (2,239 vs 1,344 assets)
• You’re an experienced trader comfortable with $200 minimum who wants maximum stock CFD access

Choose Pepperstone If:

• Zero minimum deposit removes entry barriers and allows testing with any capital amount
• Superior regulatory coverage through 7 licenses, including FCA, BaFin, DFSA matters for security
• Forex pair diversity is essential (90 currency pairs vs IC Markets’ 61)
• Commodity trading forms core strategy (40 commodities vs 26)
• Cryptocurrency CFDs beyond major coins appeal (30 crypto assets vs 19)
• Modern payment methods, including Apple Pay, Google Pay, and comprehensive crypto deposits, fit your preference
• Advanced copy trading through native platform, DupliTrade, Myfxbook matters
• You’re a beginner starting with minimal capital who wants maximum forex and commodity selection
• Daily market analysis and active research tools influence your trading decisions
• Tightest raw spreads starting from 0.0 pips on EUR/USD (before commission)

Compare also!

Eightcap vs IC Markets (2025): We Tested Both—Here’s What We Found

Forex.com vs Eightcap: Which Broker Wins in 2025?

Exness vs HFM: Which Forex Broker Is Better For You In 2025?

Octa vs Exness: Read This Before Choosing Your Forex Broker

Final Recommendation

Choose IC Markets if you prioritize absolute lowest costs, massive stock CFD selection, free VPS hosting, and industry-leading reputation (4.9/5 rating). Select Pepperstone if you value zero minimum deposit, superior regulatory coverage (FCA, BaFin), largest forex/commodity selection, modern payment methods, and advanced copy trading ecosystem.

Both rank among the world’s elite ECN brokers—your decision depends on specific feature priorities rather than fundamental quality differences.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Which broker is better for beginners?

Pepperstone emerges as the superior choice for absolute beginners due to its $0 minimum deposit eliminating capital barriers entirely, compared to IC Markets’ $200 requirement. The zero-entry policy allows new traders to test live market conditions with any affordable amount while learning platform functionality and strategy execution. Pepperstone’s superior regulatory coverage through FCA, BaFin, and DFSA also provides peace of mind for risk-averse newcomers.

Which has lower trading costs?

IC Markets delivers marginally lower total trading costs across most instruments. On EUR/USD, IC Markets Raw Spread accounts charge 0.1 pip spread plus $7/lot commission (0.8 pip total cost on MT4/MT5, or 0.7 pips on cTrader with $6 commission). Pepperstone Razor accounts start from 0.0 pip spread plus $7/lot commission (0.7 pip total cost). While Pepperstone’s raw spreads begin tighter, IC Markets’ cTrader platform ($6 commission vs $7) ties the total cost at 0.7 pips.

Are both brokers regulated?

Yes, both maintain exceptional multi-jurisdictional regulation surpassing industry standards. Pepperstone holds seven regulatory licenses, including the FCA, ASIC, and CySEC. IC Markets, on the other hand, operates under five licenses, including ASIC, and CySEC.

Can I trade crypto on both platforms?

Yes, both brokers offer cryptocurrency CFD trading, though Pepperstone provides significantly more options with 30 crypto CFDs versus IC Markets’ 19 crypto assets. Pepperstone’s selection includes Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, Ripple, Cardano, Solana, Polygon, Chainlink, and numerous emerging altcoins. IC Markets focuses on major cryptocurrencies (Bitcoin, Ethereum, major altcoins) without extensive altcoin coverage. Neither broker provides actual cryptocurrency ownership—both offer leveraged CFD contracts allowing long and short positions.

Which broker offers better leverage?

IC Markets offers marginally higher maximum leverage at 1:500 through its FSA Seychelles entity versus Pepperstone’s 1:400 maximum through CMA Kenya regulation. However, this difference proves irrelevant for most traders under tier-1 regulation. ASIC, FCA, CySEC, BaFin, and DFSA entities cap retail leverage at 1:30 for forex, 1:20 for indices, 1:10 for commodities, 1:5 for stocks, and 1:2 for crypto—identical across both brokers.

Do either offer demo accounts?

Yes, both IC Markets and Pepperstone provide unlimited demo accounts with virtual funds for comprehensive risk-free practice. Pepperstone and IC Markets demos support MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, and cTrader platforms. Both demos include educational resources, charting tools, and full EA/algorithm testing capabilities.

What are the minimum deposit requirements?

Pepperstone requires $0 minimum deposit for all account types (Standard and Razor), eliminating entry barriers completely and allowing traders to deposit any amount they’re comfortable with—even $10 or $20 for testing. IC Markets sets its minimum at $200 for both Standard and Raw Spread accounts. This $200 difference proves significant for beginners, traders in developing markets where $200 represents substantial capital, or experienced traders simply wanting to test a new broker with minimal commitment.

Can I use Expert Advisors (EAs) and automated trading?

Yes, both brokers fully support Expert Advisors and algorithmic trading without restrictions across all platforms. IC Markets provides EA support on MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, and cTrader (through cAlgo using C# programming), with free VPS hosting for accounts maintaining $5,000+ balances or trading 30+ lots monthly—ensuring 24/7 EA operation without personal computer requirements. Pepperstone similarly supports unlimited EAs on MT4, MT5, and cTrader platforms, though lacks complimentary VPS hosting (traders must use third-party VPS providers at additional cost).

Which broker offers better copy trading options?

Pepperstone dominates copy trading with superior ecosystem integration including native copy trading built directly into their platform, DupliTrade automated strategy marketplace with 100+ signal providers, and Myfxbook AutoTrade integration.  IC Markets offers ZuluTrade integration and Myfxbook AutoTrade, providing solid copy trading capabilities but lacking native platform integration and the DupliTrade marketplace.

Which broker has faster execution speeds?

Both brokers deliver institutional-grade execution speeds that satisfy even the most demanding scalping strategies. Pepperstone averages 38-45 milliseconds execution time, while IC Markets achieves 40-50 milliseconds—a marginal 2-5ms difference that proves negligible in practical trading. Both utilize fiber optic connectivity to major liquidity hubs (New York NY4, London LD4, Tokyo) and aggregate pricing from multiple tier-1 liquidity providers including major banks and financial institutions. Both implement true ECN execution without dealing desk intervention, eliminating requotes and ensuring orders fill at best available market prices. Server infrastructure spans global data centers minimizing latency for traders worldwide.

Do both brokers offer negative balance protection?

Yes, both IC Markets and Pepperstone provide negative balance protection for all retail accounts across all regulatory jurisdictions. This critical safety feature prevents your account balance from dropping below zero during extreme market volatility events like the 2015 Swiss Franc crisis, ensuring you cannot lose more than your deposited capital.